Home IOS Development The place View.activity will get its main-actor isolation from – Ole Begemann

The place View.activity will get its main-actor isolation from – Ole Begemann

The place View.activity will get its main-actor isolation from – Ole Begemann


SwiftUI’s .activity modifier inherits its actor context from the encircling operate. When you name .activity inside a view’s physique property, the async operation will run on the principle actor as a result of View.physique is (semi-secretly) annotated with @MainActor. Nevertheless, in case you name .activity from a helper property or operate that isn’t @MainActor-annotated, the async operation will run within the cooperative thread pool.

Right here’s an instance. Discover the 2 .activity modifiers in physique and helperView. The code is similar in each, but solely certainly one of them compiles — in helperView, the decision to a main-actor-isolated operate fails as a result of we’re not on the principle actor in that context:

Xcode showing the compiler diagnostic 'Expression is 'async' but is not marked with await'
We are able to name a main-actor-isolated operate from inside physique, however not from a helper property.
import SwiftUI

@MainActor func onMainActor() {
  print("on MainActor")

struct ContentView: View {
  var physique: some View {
    VStack {
      Textual content("in physique")
        .activity {
          // We are able to name a @MainActor func with out await

  var helperView: some View {
    Textual content("in helperView")
      .activity {
        // ❗️ Error: Expression is 'async' however will not be marked with 'await'

This habits is attributable to two (semi-)hidden annotations within the SwiftUI framework:

  1. The View protocol annotates its physique property with @MainActor. This transfers to all conforming sorts.

  2. View.activity annotates its motion parameter with @_inheritActorContext, inflicting it to undertake the actor context from its use web site.

Sadly, none of those annotations are seen within the SwiftUI documentation, making it very obscure what’s occurring. The @MainActor annotation on View.physique is current in Xcode’s generated Swift interface for SwiftUI (Soar to Definition of View), however that function doesn’t work reliably for me, and as we’ll see, it doesn’t present the entire fact, both.

Xcode showing the generated interface for SwiftUI’s View protocol. The @MainActor annotation on View.body is selected.
View.physique is annotated with @MainActor in Xcode’s generated interface for SwiftUI.

To actually see the declarations the compiler sees, we have to have a look at SwiftUI’s module interface file. A module interface is sort of a header file for Swift modules. It lists the module’s public declarations and even the implementations of inlinable features. Module interfaces use regular Swift syntax and have the .swiftinterface file extension.

SwiftUI’s module interface is situated at:

[Path to Xcode.app]/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneOS.sdk/System/Library/Frameworks/SwiftUI.framework/Modules/SwiftUI.swiftmodule/arm64e-apple-ios.swiftinterface

(There may be a number of .swiftinterface information in that listing, one per CPU structure. Choose any certainly one of them. Professional tip for viewing the file in Xcode: Editor > Syntax Coloring > Swift permits syntax highlighting.)

Inside, you’ll discover that View.physique has the @MainActor(unsafe) attribute:

@obtainable(iOS 13.0, macOS 10.15, tvOS 13.0, watchOS 6.0, *)
@_typeEraser(AnyView) public protocol View {
  // …
  @SwiftUI.ViewBuilder @_Concurrency.MainActor(unsafe) var physique: Self.Physique { get }

And also you’ll discover this declaration for .activity, together with the @_inheritActorContext attribute:

@obtainable(iOS 15.0, macOS 12.0, tvOS 15.0, watchOS 8.0, *)
extension SwiftUI.View {
  #if compiler(>=5.3) && $AsyncAwait && $Sendable && $InheritActorContext
    @inlinable public func activity(
      precedence: _Concurrency.TaskPriority = .userInitiated,
      @_inheritActorContext _ motion: @escaping @Sendable () async -> Swift.Void
    ) -> some SwiftUI.View {
      modifier(_TaskModifier(precedence: precedence, motion: motion))
  // …

Xcode showing the declaration for the View.task method in the SwiftUI.swiftinterface file. The @_inheritActorContext annotation is selected.
SwiftUI’s module interface file reveals the @_inheritActorContext annotatation on View.activity.

Armed with this data, every little thing makes extra sense:

  • When used inside physique, activity inherits the @MainActor context from physique.
  • When used exterior of physique, there isn’t any implicit @MainActor annotation, so activity will run its operation on the cooperative thread pool by default. (Until the view comprises an @ObservedObject or @StateObject property, which by some means makes the complete view @MainActor. However that’s a unique subject.)

The lesson: in case you use helper properties or features in your view, contemplate annotating them with @MainActor to get the identical semantics as physique.

By the way in which, be aware that the actor context solely applies to code that’s positioned instantly contained in the async closure, in addition to to synchronous features the closure calls. Async features select their very own execution context, so any name to an async operate can change to a unique executor. For instance, in case you name URLSession.knowledge(from:) inside a main-actor-annotated operate, the runtime will hop to the worldwide cooperative executor to execute that methodology. See SE-0338: Make clear the Execution of Non-Actor-Remoted Async Capabilities for the exact guidelines.

I perceive Apple’s impetus to not present unofficial API or language options within the documentation lest builders get the preposterous concept to make use of these options in their very own code!

However it makes understanding so a lot tougher. Earlier than I noticed the annotations within the .swiftinterface file, the habits of the code firstly of this text by no means made sense to me. Hiding the main points makes issues look like magic once they really aren’t. And that’s not good, both.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here